EG "make me a 120 minute Star Trek / Star Wars crossover". It should be more or less comparable to a big-budget studio film, although it doesn't have to pass a full Turing Test as long as it's pretty good. The AI doesn't have to be available to the public, as long as it's confirmed to exist.
@Blomfilter also with 'subject reference'... a film can have a continuous actor appearing in multiple scenes
https://hailuoai.video/discover/333795669912666112
@louis IIRC correctly, is was clarified that it has to be live-action -- but perhaps that was a related market for a shorter timeline. I think this is a mistake, because animated films are often better than live-action.
@Duncn Well okay then. You could probably just render a """live-action""" through good enough animation though haha
@Duncn It's immaterial, because it's never been (at least to me, which is the correct view on most things anyway) about the ability to generate video, but about the ability to maintain coherence over the long run.
Which is why this market is not significantly lower than this one: /Shump/in-2028-will-an-ai-be-able-to-gener-2103270803d9
@skibidist good question. I'd throw this one into the mix, which is similar to the one you linked, but with (possibly?) shorter timelines*, a bit more fleshed out criteria and crucially it does need to be available to the public (and cheaply). https://manifold.markets/Fion/will-good-quality-personalised-ai-n
Seems to me like the present market should be lower, my market should be lower, and the one you linked should maybe be higher?
Unless everybody is basically just trading on "will AGI be achieved" in which case maybe it's right that they're all quite similar...
*Close date suggests the same, but Shump doesn't explicitly say if they mean the start of 2028 or at any point in 2028...
@skibidist compute requirements being at least an order of magnitude higher will definitely limit the amount of research iterations on full movies vs novels
@Mad2live you don't need to hold the whole film in a single context window. Generate a shotlist and some metadata about your actors, sets, etc. for continuity, and generate shots one by one. A ten second shot is long in modern cinema.
@robm It needed to be the last 10 days to keep up the pace, assuming that was 1% of the way (which I don't assume.)
@DavidBolin I reject your premise of framing progress over just a few days. When this question opened almost 2 years ago, we were still holding our papers over videos like this
We're more than 40% of the way between that and Sonic 3.
I understand this market on this terms: three years from now, all entertainment will be on AI hands. Disney et all will either have bought OpenAI or have sold to them, given any customer can just type a prompt and get exactly what they want. Why bother paying Netflix, Disney+ or any other? If you can make a 120m movie, is it too difficult to make a game from the same or similar prompt? Please destroy my argument, thanks!
@JaimeSantaCruz Time delay, cost for individuals necessitating still paying a distributor and designer, limitations in creative direction, random quality facets, lobbying against it by companies or by workers or general social dislike making it infeasible to bring to market.
But yes, if this happens it does indicate a pretty big upheaval, but I do kinda expect that with AI.
@JaimeSantaCruz there would be a gap between generating a movie and generating the best movie in one query. Until then, Netflix can be an army of "curators" to sift through the piles of slop suggested by "producers".
@ICRainbow Or, an AI can generate it (o6 + Sora(Expensive) ) which costs $10_000 per prompt (so it's better than making a movie traditionally, but every youtuber doesn't do it for every video)